A
Species Profile

Australopithecus

Australopithecus

Two legs, small brain, big legacy
lorenza62/Shutterstock.com

Australopithecus Distribution

Click a location to explore more animals from that region

Endemic Species
Loading map...

Size Comparison

Human 5'8"
Australopithecus 4 ft 3 in

Australopithecus stands at 75% of average human height.

Australopitchecus

At a Glance

Genus Overview This page covers the Australopithecus genus as a group. Stats below are general traits shared across the genus.
Also Known As australopith, australopithecine, australopithecines, southern ape
Diet Omnivore
Activity Diurnal
Lifespan 20 years
Weight 55 lbs
Status Not Evaluated
Did You Know?

The genus spans the Pliocene into the early Pleistocene, overlapping the earliest Homo in time.

Scientific Classification

Genus Overview "Australopithecus" is not a single species but represents an entire genus containing multiple species.

Australopithecus is an extinct genus of early hominins (human relatives) from Africa, generally dating to roughly ~4.2–2 million years ago, showing habitual bipedalism alongside relatively small brains and some ape-like cranio-dental/postcranial traits.

Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
Chordata
Class
Mammalia
Order
Primates
Family
Hominidae
Genus
Australopithecus

Distinguishing Features

  • Habitual bipedal locomotion (pelvis/leg/foot adaptations) with some climbing-related anatomy in many species
  • Small cranial capacity relative to later Homo, with hominin-like dentition trends
  • Combination of ape-like and human-like skeletal traits ('mosaic evolution')
  • Fossil record primarily in East Africa (e.g., Ethiopia, Kenya, Tanzania) and South Africa

Physical Measurements

Males and females differ in size

Height
4 ft 9 in (3 ft 11 in – 5 ft 3 in)
3 ft 11 in (3 ft 3 in – 4 ft 9 in)
Weight
99 lbs (66 lbs – 121 lbs)
73 lbs (55 lbs – 99 lbs)
Top Speed
12 mph
Australopithecus ~20 km/h

Appearance

Primary Colors
Secondary Colors
Skin Type Australopithecus had mammal skin with body hair—likely more than modern humans, maybe less than some African apes. Hard palms and soles and thick foot skin fit regular two-legged walking. Fossils don't show color or hair.
Distinctive Features
  • Extinct African hominin genus spanning roughly the Pliocene to early Pleistocene (~4.2-2.0 million years ago), known primarily from East and South Africa; represents a diverse radiation rather than a single body plan.
  • Overall body size range across the genus (smallest to largest members, approximate): stature ~1.0-1.6 m; body mass ~25-55+ kg (with substantial sex-based and species-to-species variation, and uncertainty due to fragmentary fossils).
  • Brain size generally small compared with early Homo: approximate endocranial volume across the genus commonly cited in the ~375-550 cc range (varies by species and specimens).
  • Mosaic locomotor anatomy: habitual bipedalism is broadly supported across the genus (pelvis/femur/foot traits), while many species retain some arboreal-capable features (e.g., aspects of shoulder/upper limb/hand curvature) to varying degrees.
  • Australopithecus skull and teeth: faces stick out more than later Homo, canines are smaller than in apes, and many species have large back teeth; tooth strength and face shape change across the genus over time.
  • Postcranial proportions and gait-related traits vary across species: some show more human-like lower-limb adaptations, while others retain stronger climbing-related signals; do not assume identical locomotor performance across all Australopithecus species.
  • Australopithecus ate many foods, mainly plants like fruits, leaves, tubers (underground storage organs), and seeds, but sometimes animals; isotope and tooth-wear studies show diet varied by local habitat.
  • Habitat use (generalized): occupation of mosaic environments (woodland-bushland-riparian-open habitats) inferred across the genus; degree of open-country vs wooded association varies by region and time and should not be treated as uniform.
  • Estimated lifespan shorter than modern humans; many died in childhood or early adulthood. Typical adult lifespan about 15–30 years, with possible maximums ~35–45 years. Estimates based on dental development, skeletal aging, and mortality profiles; uncertain.
  • Probably social primates that lived in groups, looked for food in different places, and adapted to many environments. Mating systems, group sizes, and male competition likely differed by species.
  • Some Australopithecus may have used simple tools to help find food in certain places, but making stone tools was not proven for the whole genus; don't assume it was uniform.
  • More adapted to walking on two legs than Ardipithecus, but still had climbing traits. Had smaller brains and more variation in teeth and body bones than early Homo; their relationship is still studied.

Sexual Dimorphism

Sexual dimorphism is inferred across the genus, primarily in body size/robusticity; the magnitude likely varies among species and populations. Dimorphism is generally described as moderate (often less than in strongly dimorphic apes but more than in many modern human populations), though estimates depend on small, biased fossil samples.

  • On average larger body mass and stature; more robust postcranial elements in many fossil samples (degree varies by species).
  • Potentially more pronounced craniofacial robusticity in some assemblages (e.g., thicker supraorbital regions or broader faces), though overlap and sampling uncertainty are substantial.
  • Greater overall muscle attachment expression on some elements (inferred from bone morphology), not uniform across all species.
  • On average smaller body mass and stature; more gracile limb and pelvic elements in many fossil samples (degree varies by species).
  • Pelvic morphology consistent with bipedal locomotion and childbirth constraints; detailed obstetric implications vary by species and are not identical across the genus.
  • Considerable overlap with males in many traits, making sex attribution difficult for isolated fossils and emphasizing within-genus and within-species variability.

Did You Know?

The genus spans the Pliocene into the early Pleistocene, overlapping the earliest Homo in time.

Across species, Australopithecus shows a "mosaic" body plan: bipedal hips/knees with climbing-capable shoulders/arms.

Brain size stayed relatively small (roughly ~375-550 cm³) even as bipedal walking was well established.

Fossils come mainly from East and South Africa, including Ethiopia, Kenya, Tanzania, and South Africa; one species is known from Chad.

Laetoli footprints (Tanzania, ~3.6 Ma) show a human-like bipedal gait associated with Australopithecus afarensis.

Diet was flexible: many populations ate a mix of woodland foods, but isotopes show some relied substantially on C4 resources (grasses/sedges).

Famous finds (e.g., "Lucy," "Taung Child") are Australopithecus, but they represent different species-highlighting the genus's diversity.

Unique Adaptations

  • Pelvis, femur, and knee adapted for efficient upright walking compared with earlier hominins (e.g., Ardipithecus), though not identical to modern humans.
  • Feet consistent with weight-bearing bipedalism; in some species/populations, toes and arches suggest a gait approaching human-like patterns.
  • Teeth and jaws generally built for heavy chewing (relatively large molars/premolars and thick enamel), with differences among species reflecting different diets.
  • Relatively long arms and certain shoulder traits supporting powerful climbing/overhead reaching-evidence of retained arboreal capability alongside bipedalism.
  • Small cranial capacity but reorganized facial/cranial traits compared with earlier hominins; overall anatomy bridges earlier hominins and early Homo.
  • Body size range across the genus suggests ecological and possibly social flexibility: roughly ~1.0-1.5 m tall and ~25-55 kg (smallest to largest members).

Interesting Behaviors

  • Habitual bipedal walking, with variation in stride and foot anatomy among species/populations.
  • Regular climbing or clambering likely remained important (inferred from upper-limb and shoulder anatomy), especially for foraging or refuge.
  • Broad, opportunistic foraging in mixed habitats (woodlands, bushland, river edges, open patches), varying by site and time.
  • Possible (but not definitive) tool use: australopith hands and cognition could support simple tool behaviors; secure stone-tool traditions are clearer in later Homo.
  • Likely social lives comparable to other great apes, with group living inferred indirectly; degree of sexual dimorphism varies across species and may reflect different mating competition pressures.
  • Dietary variation across the genus: some groups show more hard-object/abrasive wear signatures, others more generalized patterns-consistent with ecological flexibility.

Cultural Significance

Australopithecus is an extinct African hominin genus in East and South Africa about 4.2 to 2.0 million years ago. It shows walking on two legs before big brains. Famous fossils like A. afarensis (Lucy) and A. africanus shaped ideas about human ancestry and diversity.

Myths & Legends

The fossil "Lucy" (Australopithecus afarensis) was nicknamed after the Beatles song "Lucy in the Sky with Diamonds," played at the 1974 field camp in Ethiopia, a modern naming story in popular culture.

The Taung Child (Australopithecus africanus), described by Raymond Dart in 1925, became a landmark historical tale in science: an African fossil challenging Europe-centered expectations about human origins.

"Mrs Ples," a famous Australopithecus africanus skull from Sterkfontein (South Africa), gained a public persona through its nickname, reflecting how fossils enter cultural storytelling and museum lore.

In Ethiopia, 'Lucy' is also widely known by an Amharic nickname meaning 'you are marvelous,' a celebratory local name that has become part of the fossil's cultural narrative.

The genus name Australopithecus literally means 'southern ape,' reflecting early interpretations of these fossils and serving as a historical naming origin story.

Conservation Status

NE Not Evaluated

Has not yet been evaluated against the criteria.

Population Unknown

Protected Under

  • Protection typically occurs via national antiquities/heritage and protected-areas frameworks in range states rather than wildlife law (e.g., cultural heritage/antiquities legislation and site protections in countries with key Australopithecus localities such as South Africa, Ethiopia, Tanzania, and Kenya).

You might be looking for:

Australopithecus afarensis

28%

Australopithecus afarensis

East African species best known from the fossil 'Lucy'; bipedal with ape-like features.

Australopithecus africanus

22%

Australopithecus africanus

South African australopith; important early hominin fossil species.

Australopithecus sediba

18%

Australopithecus sediba

South African species with a mosaic of australopith and Homo-like traits.

Australopithecus anamensis

17%

Australopithecus anamensis

Early East African species; among the oldest widely accepted Australopithecus members.

Australopithecus garhi

15%

Australopithecus garhi

Ethiopian species sometimes discussed in relation to early tool use and Homo origins.

Life Cycle

Birth 1 infant
Lifespan 20 years

Lifespan

In the Wild
10–40 years

Reproduction

Mating System Polygynandry
Social Structure Aggregation Group
Breeding Pattern Serial
Fertilization Internal Fertilization
Birth Type Internal_fertilization

Australopithecus likely lived in small to medium groups. Mating was probably polygynandry (multi-male/multi-female) with short-term, not lifelong, pairings. Sexual dimorphism varied between species, so mating patterns likely varied. No clear evidence of cooperative breeding.

Behavior & Ecology

Social Troop Group: 15
Activity Diurnal
Diet Omnivore Variable across the genus; commonly inferred "fallback" reliance on underground storage organs (tubers/rhizomes) and tough sedge/grass resources during lean seasons, with fruit more important when available.

Temperament

Social (group-tolerant but with competition likely, especially among males)
Cautious/vigilant in exposed or mixed habitats (predation risk)
Opportunistic forager (flexible, exploratory)
Hierarchical tendencies likely (dominance relationships inferred from primate analogs), but strength of hierarchy may have varied across species/populations

Communication

contact calls To maintain cohesion during foraging/travel
alarm calls Predator-specific or urgency-graded, inferred from primate analogs
grunts/barks Short-range coordination, mild threats, or attention-getting
screams/raucous calls Distress, intense aggression, or recruitment
juvenile distress calls
facial expressions Threat faces, appeasement signals; inferred from primate musculature/behavioral analogy
gestures and body postures Reaching, presenting, bluff displays, directional cues
tactile communication Grooming, comforting contact, infant carrying/handling
visual displays Stares, piloerection-like display analogs, arm/torso posturing
possible use of rhythmic ground/object slaps as attention signals Speculative, based on great-ape/primate display repertoires rather than direct evidence

Habitat

Biomes:
Savanna Tropical Dry Forest Wetland Freshwater
Terrain:
Valley Plateau Plains Riverine Hilly Rocky Karst +1
Elevation: Up to 9842 ft 6 in

Ecological Role

Flexible omnivorous forager in African Plio-Pleistocene ecosystems, linking plant production to higher trophic levels and exploiting both arboreal and terrestrial resources.

Seed dispersal via fruit consumption (where fruit intake was substantial) Vegetation browsing and pruning of leaves/shoots Soil disturbance and aeration through digging for tubers/roots and foraging for invertebrates Energy transfer from invertebrate/occasional vertebrate consumption to primate biomass, supporting predator guilds (as prey for large carnivores)

Diet Details

Main Prey:
Insects and other invertebrates Small vertebrates Eggs and nestlings Carrion and marrow from scavenged carcasses
Other Foods:
Fleshy fruits and soft plant tissues Leaves and young shoots Seeds and nuts Grasses and sedges Underground storage organs Roots and pith Flowers +1

Human Interaction

Domestication Status

Wild

Australopithecus is an extinct African genus of early hominins about 4.2 to 2.0 million years ago. It was wild and never domesticated or kept by humans; it lived before Homo sapiens. Today people study Australopithecus through fossil digs, museum care, research, and public education. Body, brain, and behavior varied by species and place.

As a Pet

Not Suitable as Pet

Legality: Not applicable/impossible: the genus is extinct. Any fossils/specimens are typically protected by national heritage and antiquities laws; private trade/possession is often illegal or highly regulated. Keeping a live Australopithecus as a pet is not possible.

Care Level: Expert Only

Purchase Cost:
Lifetime Cost:

Economic Value

Uses:
Scientific research value Educational value Museum and heritage value Tourism value (sites/museums) Cultural and historical value
Products:
  • Fossil specimens and casts for research/teaching (legal, permitted contexts)
  • Museum exhibits and replica production
  • Heritage tourism associated with fossil localities and institutions
  • Academic publications, imaging datasets (e.g., CT scans), and educational media

Relationships

Related Species 6

Humans
Humans Homo sapiens Shared Family
Robust australopiths Paranthropus Shared Family
Ardipithecines Ardipithecus Shared Family
Kenyanthropus Kenyanthropus Shared Family
Chimpanzees Pan Shared Family
Gorillas
Gorillas Gorilla Shared Family

Ecological Equivalents 5

Animals that fill a similar ecological role in their ecosystem

Baboon
Baboon Papio spp. Terrestrial to semiterrestrial African primates that commonly forage on the ground in savanna-woodland mosaics. Used as an ecological analog for predator pressure, group living, and broad omnivory, although baboons are quadrupedal and not close relatives.
Gelada Theropithecus gelada Primates adapted to open habitats with heavy reliance on ground foraging. Useful as a niche comparison for habitat exposure and carnivore risk, although diet and locomotion differ.
Early Homo Homo habilis Overlapped in time with the later part of Australopithecus' range and occupied broadly similar terrestrial foraging niches; likely competed for or partitioned resources as early Homo had increasing tool-related access to meat.
Robust australopiths Paranthropus boisei Co-occurred in parts of Africa during the early Pleistocene. Similar overall body size and terrestriality but with more specialized chewing anatomy and, as often inferred, more specialized diets—useful as a contrast to Australopithecus diversity.
African wild dogs Lycaon pictus Modern ecological analog for cursorial, pack-hunting canids that could have exerted predation pressure on small-bodied hominins in open habitats. Plio-Pleistocene canid guilds likely played similar roles.

Types of Australopithecus

7

Explore 7 recognized types of australopithecus

Anamensis australopith Australopithecus anamensis
Afarensis australopith Australopithecus afarensis
African australopith Australopithecus africanus
Bahrelghazal australopith Australopithecus bahrelghazali
Garhi australopith Australopithecus garhi
Sediba australopith Australopithecus sediba
Deyiremeda australopith Australopithecus deyiremeda
The Australopithecus has an ape-like face with a flat nose, strong protruding jaw and small canine teeth.

Evolution

Australopithecus was a genus of ancient primates, believed to be a close relative of modern humans and human-like ancestors. There are approximately ten recognized species of Australopithecus that lived around 4.4 million to 1.4 million years ago. Ever since the first fossil was discovered, paleontologists have debated whether Australopithecus represents a direct ancestor of humanity or a side branch. The earliest members of the Australopithecus genus were certainly more ape-like than humans. Various later species of Australopithecus have been proposed as possible direct ancestors of the Homo genus to which we belong, but the matter has not been properly resolved.

Australopithecus nevertheless reveals some important facts about human evolution. It has definitively proven to be a bipedal animal, meaning it had the ability to walk upright on two legs. This bipedalism probably evolved early on after it split off from other apes some 6 to 7 million years ago. And yet in many other respects, Australopithecus shares more in common with modern apes, which suggests that the characteristics unique to humans only evolved later on within our own genus of Homo. Our theories about human evolution continue to develop as more evidence is uncovered.

Description & Size

Australopitchecus female at a museum

The Australopithecus were bipedal, meaning they walked upright like humans.

Depending on the species, Australopithecus featured an interesting cross of human-like and ape-like characteristics. Altogether, it probably had more ape-like features, including a flat nose, a strong jaw that projected outward, long arms, curved fingers, and a small braincase; the brain was thought to be about a third the size of a modern human. It also probably had thick hair covering most of its body. However, Australopithecus also began to evolve some human-like features, including small canine teeth and the ability to walk upright on two legs. All the members of this genus probably split their time between living on the ground and living in the trees. Even as they walked upright, their arms and hands were well-adapted for climbing.

Australopithecus tended to be shorter than modern humans and showed a strong degree of sexual differences in height. Based on what we know of the fossils of Australopithecus afarensis, for example, the male stood about an average of 5 feet tall and weighed 92 pounds, whereas the female stood about 3 feet 5 inches tall and weighed around 64 pounds on average. Australopithecus africanus, on the other hand, tended to have shorter males and taller females, so the difference was only an average of 7 inches between them. Unlike many other primate species, in which the size of the male canine teeth is a mark of dominance, the canines of the males and females of the Australopithecus genus are about the same size. This may have something to do with differences in social structure and behavior compared with other great apes.

The name Australopithecus derives from the combination of two words: australis means southern in Latin, whereas pithekos means ape in Greek. Together this term means southern ape. The name refers to the fact that the first fossils were found in South Africa. In reality, it lived no more south than other apes.

Here is a quick breakdown of the characteristics of Australopithecus:

  • Ape-like face with a flat nose and strong protruding jaw
  • Small canine teeth
  • Long arms with curved fingers
  • Small braincase
  • Long bipedal legs for walking upright
  • Body covered in dense hair

Behavior and Society

Australopithecus afarensis

Australopithecus was believed to have a brain one-third the size of humans.

The cognitive ability of Australopithecus is one of the most debated aspects of its physiology. For a long time, it was assumed that Australopithecus did not have the ability to produce complex stone tools, but more recent archaeological findings from 1994 and later from 2010 indicate that some members of Australopithecus were hunting for meat and even using stone tools to do it as early as 3.4 million years ago. Their hand anatomy appears well-suited for gripping and manipulating tools.

Studies of its skeleton have shown that Australopithecus probably did have the ability to hang from branches and support its entire weight with its arms. It’s also been suggested that some species may have slept in trees during the night. It’s not entirely clear why bipedal locomotion emerged in human-like ancestors, but Australopithecus proves that bipedalism predates the evolution of larger brains, whereas for a long time was assumed to be the other way around.

Australopithecus likely lived in fairly complex societies, but the exact nature of these societies remains unknown. The smaller canine teeth of the males could indicate less overall aggression and competition for mates compared with other great apes.

Diet – What Did Australopithecus Eat?

The examination of Australopithecus teeth has been scientists’ primary means of reconstructing this ancient ape’s diet.

Australopithecus was thought to eat mostly a plant-based or invertebrate-heavy diet, including fruits, vegetables, seeds, roots, nuts, and even insects. They may have also occasionally consumed small vertebrates such as lizards to supplement their diet. Scientists can determine their diet by examining the fairly mild wear and scratches on their teeth. The size and shape of their teeth also indicate they were capable of eating harder foods as well, but overall, meat probably formed an overall small part of their diet.

Habitat – When and Where It lived

Australopithecus probably lived some 4.4 million to 1.4 million years ago during the Pliocene and Pleistocene epochs. Members of this genus preferred to live in the grasslands, savannas, and open woodlands throughout Eastern and Southern Africa, often with plenty of tree cover around. The greatest concentration of fossils has been found around Ethiopia and the Horn of Africa region. Different species of Australopithecus and other human-like genera all lived together and overlapped to some degree.

Threats and Predators

Female lion, or lioness, in the Kalahari desert

Lions could have been one of Australopithecus’ most vicious predators.

Depending on the age and size of the individual, Australopithecus was probably preyed upon by wild dogs, hyenas, crocodiles, eagles, and big cats like lions. One estimate put the rate of predation at somewhere between 6 and 10 percent. This is comparable to the rate of predation for antelopes and ground-living monkeys as well.

Discoveries and Fossils – Where It was Found

Australopithecus skull

This Australopithecus skull replica illustrates the trademark protruding jaw structure.

Australopithecus fossils were found as early as 1924 in a lime quarry in South Africa. The first fossil was named the Taung Child after the town in which it was found. This skull was soon identified as belonging to an entirely new species called Australopithecus africanus. However, it took a few more decades before scientists reached a consensus about its place in the evolutionary tree. At that time, it was still being debated whether the Taung Child was an example of early human-like ancestors or mere non-bipedal apes. Because they uncovered nothing more than a skull, scientists could say nothing about how it moved around.

Perhaps the most well-known specimen ever found was Lucy, a member of the species Australopithecus afarensis who lived some 3.2 million years ago. Named after the famous Beatles song “Lucy in the Sky with Diamonds,” some 40 percent of her skeleton was found in 1974 at the Awash Valley excavation site in Ethiopia. By meticulously reconstructing her skeleton, scientists could demonstrate reasonably that Lucy had a pelvis and leg bones that resembled modern humans. It was considered to be one of the most important and infamous findings in paleontological history.

Since then, even more complete skeletons have been found. Between 1994 and 1998, an Australopithecus specimen named Little Foot was found in the cave system of Sterkfontein, South Africa. Although it was difficult to recover from the rock, the skeleton was almost entirely complete and yielded important clues about its anatomy. Dating showed that it was alive around 3 million years ago. The earliest example of bipedalism in primates dates back some 3.6 million years ago. Footprints were found in volcanic ash near the Laetoli excavation site in Tanzania. They are most commonly attributed to Australopithecus afarensis and possibly another species.

Extinction – When Did It Die Out?

Australopithecus as a genus is thought to have died out around 1.4 million years ago. It is not entirely clear why Australopithecus eventually went extinct. Various explanations have been proposed, including the possibility of a changing climate and fierce competition with the early members of the Homo genus. The earliest members of our genus such as Homo habilis probably emerged more than 2 million years ago, which means it overlapped with Australopithecus for a short time.

Similar Animals to the Australopithecus

Chimpanzees are Australopithecus’ closest living relatives.

Australopithecus is probably most similar to the apes from which it evolved, as well as other human-like species. These include:

  • Paranthropus – This genus lived at about the same time as the Australopithecus. In fact, the two are so similar that some experts place them both within the same genus. Just like Australopithecus, it was mostly ape-like in nature, but it was also bipedal and capable of using more complex stone tools.
  • Homo habilis – This species has long been thought to be an early example of human ancestors. However, because of its smaller brain and more ape-like features, some experts have argued that it should be a member of the Australopithecus genus, not Homo.
  • Chimpanzees – The closest living relative of Australopithecus is probably the chimpanzee. Apart from the upright stature of Australopithecus, they had fairly similar anatomy and diet.

Types of Australopithecus

Australopithecus anemensisThe most ancient member of the Australopithecus family, this ape lived sometime 4.2 million to 3.9 million years ago.
Australopithecus deyiremedaOnly discovered in 2015, this Australopithecus lived  3.3-3.5 million years ago.
Australopithecus bahrelghazali 3.5 million to 3 million year old species discovered in the 1990’s in Chad.
Australopithecus aethiopicusThe largest known members of their family, aethiopicus lived 2.7 million to 2.3 million years ago.
Australopithecus garhiPerhaps the first austalopithecus to use stone tools, only one complete skull fossil and a few small fragments of this  2.5 million year old ape have been discovered.
Australopithecus robustus1.9 million to 1.2 million year old Australopithecus first discovered in 1938.
Australopithecus boiseiLived 2.3 million to 1.4 million years ago, this ape is another contender for the first maker of primitive tools.
Australopithecus sediba2 fossils of this species dated to be 1.78 million and 1.95 million years old were discovered in 2008.
Australopithecus africanusLived in Southern Africa about 3.3 A to 2.1 million years ago. The “Tuang Child” specimen belongs to this species.
Australopithecus afarensisLived about 3.9 million to 2.9 million years ago, the famous fossil “Lucy” is a member of this species.

View all 326 animals that start with A

Sources

  1. USC / Accessed May 19, 2022
  2. National Museum of Natural History / Accessed May 19, 2022
  3. Britannica / Accessed May 19, 2022
  4. Science Daily / Accessed May 19, 2022
  5. ARS Technica / Accessed May 19, 2022
Corinna Cybele

About the Author

Corinna Cybele

My name is Corinna! In my profile photo you can see me with one of my two cats, Bisky! The other's name is Yma and she's a beautiful black Bombay kitty. I'm 24 years old and I live in Birmingham, AL with my partner Anastasia and like to spend my free time making music, collecting records and reading. Some other animals I've owned were a hamster, 2 chihuahuas and many different kinds of fish.

Thank you for reading! Have some feedback for us?


Australopithecus FAQs (Frequently Asked Questions)

The first half of the name is pronounced as aw-stray-low. The second half of the name is pronounced like the pith in pithy, followed by a short eh sound, and finally cus as in cuss.